reddit · SideProject · 11-04 17:50 66 分 ← 返回列表

I built a tool that checks whether AI assistants recommend your product, and tested it on 20 indie products first

I'm the maker, so full disclosure up front. I kept wondering: when someone asks ChatGPT "best invoicing tool for freelancers", which products actually get named? So I built RadarIA. You give it your site, category and up to 3 competitors. It asks ~10 buyer-style questions to ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity and shows where you're named, where a rival is named instead, which URLs they cite, and a few fixes. Before launching I ran 1 prompt per product for 20 indie SaaS products, on 3

五维评分

付费意愿

需求真实度

个人可落地

竞争空间

新鲜度

AI 分析

痛点：独立SaaS开发者不知道自己是否被ChatGPT、Claude等AI助手在买家提问中推荐，被竞品抢走AI渠道流量

目标用户：独立SaaS开发者、小型B2B SaaS的增长与营销负责人

证据：I kept wondering: when someone asks ChatGPT "best invoicing tool for freelancers", which products actually get named? ... 8 weren't named by any (including a couple that have been around for years)

变现：订阅制：免费单次检查引流，付费做定期监控、竞品对比、引用来源追踪和优化建议，可按模型数或监控问题数分档

MVP：输入网址+品类+最多3个竞品，自动生成约10个买家式问题，调用3-4个主流模型API，输出可见性报告（谁被提及、引用URL、改进建议），加cron定时重跑做趋势对比

竞品：Profound、Otterly.ai、Peec AI、AthenaHQ

摘要：作者自建RadarIA测试AI助手是否推荐产品，在3个模型上对20个独立SaaS跑测：9个三个模型都推荐，8个完全未被提及（含运营多年的产品），3个结果不一致。说明GEO/AEO（生成式引擎优化）是新兴真实需求，但帖子本身是自我推广，缺第三方付费证据，且已有多个同类工具。