📡 Idea Radar 每天 8:00 / 18:00 推送 · 18:00 生成精选
reddit · SideProject · 68 分 ← 返回列表

A founder asked us which side of his marketplace to build first. We examined his business for 9 days and the answer was “the one you have zero evidence for.”

He runs RecruFY, a hiring-assessment platform: candidates take skills and personality tests, employers screen with the results. One month into paid operation, he filed one question: scale the candidate side, build the employer side, or both in parallel? He let us publish the full examination. Link in the first comment. Here’s what it found, because I think most founders have never seen their business the way an examiner sees it. What held. One 500 GEL TikTok campaign brought 1,274 sign-

五维评分

付费意愿
74
需求真实度
72
个人可落地
85
竞争空间
35
新鲜度
40

AI 分析

痛点:求职者愿意为技能/人格测评的详细结果小额付费,但招聘测评平台很难把同一批结果卖给雇主,独立开发者可从候选人付费解锁报告切入。

目标用户:求职者、初级岗位候选人、需要快速做技能筛查的小型招聘方或职业培训机构

证据:One 500 GEL TikTok campaign brought 1,274 sign-ups and 1,192 test-takers. About one in six paid 4 GEL to see their own result. 2.2× the spend on gross figures, and 5–9 payments a day kept arriving after the spend stopped. Employers: zero paying, zero positions posted, zero résumés scanned.

变现:按次付费解锁详细测评报告/证书,卖测评套餐;后续可做白标测评给招聘机构或培训机构。

MVP:2周内做一个落地页+2到3个短测评,免费给基础分数,付费解锁详细报告和可分享证书;接入Stripe/Paddle,埋TikTok广告转化追踪,先验证单次付费转化。

竞品:TestGorilla、Criteria Corp、HireVue、16Personalities、Truity

摘要:一个招聘测评平台在付费运营1个月后求助:先做候选人端还是雇主端。审查发现500 GEL的TikTok投放带来1,274个注册、1,192人测完,约1/6支付4 GEL看结果,投放停止后每天仍有5–9笔付款;但雇主端零付费、零职位发布、零简历扫描。机会在候选人侧的小额测评报告变现,雇主端需求尚未被验证。

相关精选报告

做 求职者愿意为技能/人格测评的详细结果小额付费,但招聘测评平台很难把同一批结果卖给雇主,独立开发者可从候选人付费解锁报告切入。