📡 Idea Radar 每天 8:00 / 18:00 推送 · 18:00 生成精选
reddit · SideProject · 64 分 ← 返回列表

Researched for AI-driven project ideas; shocked at how inconcrete/scammy most are; so I built a site to collect ideas that passes my sanity check

I have watched more than enough on AI projects that claimed to have worked, but its hard for me to get started, mainly because most feel too good to be true. So I started checking them for evidence and transparency. Went through like 300 of them and more than half didnt pass my sanity check: no numbers, no product, no source to link, over-the-top claims that sounds scammy. For the hundred or so that passes, I rated them on the usual angles: evidence, specificity, replicability, traction,

五维评分

付费意愿
55
需求真实度
55
个人可落地
92
竞争空间
50
新鲜度
75

AI 分析

痛点:AI副业/项目点子大多缺乏证据、无产品无数据、夸大宣传,初学者难以辨别真伪,容易踩坑浪费时间。

目标用户:想用AI做副业或独立产品的新手、独立开发者、AI创业者

证据:more than half didnt pass my sanity check: no numbers, no product, no source to link, over-the-top claims that sounds scammy. / Full analysis, rating, score and rank on every idea, is paywalled.

变现:付费订阅解锁完整评分/排名/深度分析;免费索引+周报引流;后续可加赞助、affiliate、付费社群。

MVP:2周内人工整理50-100个AI副业点子,为每个点子建立证据字段(收入数据、产品链接、可复现步骤、热度时间),做公开免费索引+邮件订阅,付费解锁完整评分和每周5个深评。

竞品:IdeasAI、Exploding Topics、AI Hustle newsletters、Goldrush Index(原帖产品)

摘要:作者检查了约300个AI项目点子,超过一半因无数据、无产品、无来源被判定不可信;把通过 sanity check 的约100个按证据、可复现性、热度等评分排名,免费索引+免费周报+付费完整分析。核心洞察:高分点子往往“无聊、窄、可验证”,病毒式传播的点子最容易被复制。