reddit · SideProject · 10-13 06:50 69 分 ← 返回列表

I built a Tinder-style deck where people swipe right only if they'd actually pay for your startup. Here's what 10K+ swipes taught me

Two weeks ago I launched iwouldpay.dev. It's a deck of indie startups, and you swipe right only if you'd pay for the product. No likes, no "cool idea". So far there have been 10,600+ swipes on 160+ startups. A few things I didn't expect: When we asked people what they'd pay, 52% picked $5/month. Small but real. The most common reasons for a "nope" were "not for me" (98), "unclear what it does" (70), "should be free" (45) and "looks unfinished" (31). "Unclear" is the one makers can act

五维评分

付费意愿

需求真实度

个人可落地

竞争空间

新鲜度

AI 分析

痛点：独立开发者难以在开发前验证用户是否真的愿意付费，且产品描述不清导致潜在用户流失。

目标用户：独立开发者、早期创业者和 indie hackers。

证据：When we asked people what they'd pay, 52% picked $5/month. Small but real. Adding your startup is free, and you get a private page showing who'd pay and why people passed.

变现：对提交创业项目收费（付费上架、高级分析、按反馈量收费），或订阅制提供验证报告、定价建议和竞品基准。

MVP：2周内做一个垂直领域的 swipe 验证页：创始人提交一句话介绍和定价，用户右滑表示愿意付费，收集拒绝原因；付费解锁谁愿意付、为什么拒绝及文案优化建议。

竞品：Product Hunt、BetaList、UserTesting、PickFu、Wynter、Reddit r/SideProject

摘要：iwouldpay.dev 两周内获得 10,600+ 次滑动、160+ 个 indie 项目参与，52% 受访者表示愿为产品付 $5/月。拒绝原因中“不清楚做什么”出现 70 次，说明付费意愿验证和产品文案优化存在真实需求。该工具本身免费，但可按验证报告或高级分析向创始人收费。