reddit · SideProject · 09-30 04:50 57 分 ← 返回列表

I built a place to practice code reviews, since thats most of the job now

AI is writing more of the code every day, so most of us are writing less and reviewing way more. And reviewing is its own skill. Reading a diff and figuring out what it actually does and where it breaks is not the same as writing it. I couldnt find anywhere to actually practice that, so I built Goodcatch. How it works: you get a PR that looks like a real one (multi file diff, GitHub style) you leave line comments, write a summary, then approve or request changes you get graded on

五维评分

付费意愿

需求真实度

个人可落地

竞争空间

新鲜度

AI 分析

痛点：AI 写代码增多后，开发者需要审查更多代码，但缺乏练习代码审查并获得有效反馈的途径。

目标用户：开发者，尤其是准备面试、晋升 Senior/Lead 的程序员，以及需要培训代码审查能力的工程团队。

证据：AI is writing more of the code every day, so most of us are writing less and reviewing way more. And reviewing is its own skill. ... I couldnt find anywhere to actually practice that, so I built Goodcatch. ... The first 3 graded reviews are free, no card.

变现：订阅制分级审查练习；团队培训与考核；面试准备包；企业招聘筛选工具。

MVP：用 LLM 生成多文件 GitHub 风格 PR diff，让用户行内评论、写总结、批准/拒绝，再由 LLM 按 rubric 评分；加入免费次数和 Stripe 付费墙。

竞品：Goodcatch（原帖产品）、LeetCode、CodeSignal、Interviewing.io、Pramp

摘要：发帖者在 r/SideProject 发布 Goodcatch，一个练习代码审查的平台，理由是 AI 写代码增多使开发者审查代码变多，而审查是独立技能且缺少练习渠道。产品提供免费 3 次评分审查，无需信用卡，并寻求对评分机制的反馈；正文未显示付费用户或真实收入数据。