reddit · SideProject · 09-30 04:50 63 分 ← 返回列表

I asked ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini the same buying question — they disagreed. So I built a tool to track it

got curious how AI assistants recommend brands, so I asked all three "What's the best digital wallet in Argentina?" Same question, different answers, and more people now ask AI before buying. So I built a small tool on Apify: you give it your brand, competitors and the questions customers ask; it queries all three engines (official APIs with web search) and returns mention rate, ranking position, who shows up instead of you, and which sources each AI cites. Some things I learned bu

五维评分

付费意愿

需求真实度

个人可落地

竞争空间

新鲜度

AI 分析

痛点：品牌方和 SEO/GEO 从业者不知道自己在 ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini 的购买推荐里被提及的频率、排名和被谁替代，缺乏可量化的监测工具。

目标用户：做 SEO/GEO 的营销人员、代理商，以及关心中文/西语等区域市场 AI 推荐结果的品牌方

证据：Same question, different answers, and more people now ask AI before buying. ... Would love feedback, especially from anyone doing SEO/GEO work: what would you want it to measure?

变现：按品牌/关键词数量分层的 SaaS 订阅（如 29–99 美元/月），或按查询次数计费；面向代理商提供白标报告和 API 额度包。

MVP：用官方 API（OpenAI/Perplexity/Gemini 带联网搜索）跑固定问题集，输出提及率、排名、竞品替代列表和被引用来源域名排行，做成每周自动跑的邮件/PDF 报告，前端一个仪表盘即可。

竞品：Profound、Peec AI、Otterly.ai、Scrunch AI、AthenaHQ、HubSpot AEO Grader、Apify 上的同类 Actor

摘要：作者发现同一句“阿根廷最好的数字钱包是哪个”在 ChatGPT、Perplexity、Gemini 上给出不同品牌推荐，于是用 Apify 做了一个 AI 可见度监测工具，可返回提及率、排名、竞品替代情况和引用来源，并在 r/SideProject 求 SEO/GEO 从业者反馈。这印证了 GEO 监测这一新需求正在形成，但赛道已被 Profound、Peec AI、Otterly 等一批工具占位，单人切入需靠地区/语种细分或更低价格取胜。帖中未出现明确的付费原话或收入数据。