reddit · SideProject · 09-20 02:50 59 分 ← 返回列表

I built a lead-scoring SaaS and realized I was solving the wrong first problem

I originally built Orty around a simple idea: Give me a potential client → I'll tell you whether they're worth contacting. Sounds useful, right? Then I started trying to get users myself. And I kept running into the exact same problem my users had: “Okay… but where the hell do I find the clients in the first place?” So I rebuilt the beginning of the workflow. I just shipped Orty Scout . Instead of starting with a lead, you start with: What do you sell? Who do you wa

五维评分

付费意愿

需求真实度

个人可落地

竞争空间

新鲜度

AI 分析

痛点：自由职业者和代理机构最难的不是给线索打分，而是不知道去哪里找到第一批潜在客户。

目标用户：自由职业者、代理机构、B2B服务提供者、顾问、销售外联人员

证据：“Okay… but where the hell do I find the clients in the first place?” / “finding clients has been one of the hardest parts of building Orty itself.” / “I'm looking for a few freelancers/agencies”

变现：订阅制 SaaS：免费版限制策略生成次数，付费版按月/年收费；按生成策略或线索分析次数加购 credits；面向代理机构提供团队席位与 CRM 集成。

MVP：做一个 AI 客户猎取策略生成器：输入你卖什么、目标客户是谁，输出渠道列表、搜索查询、正负信号、外联角度；支持保存候选客户 URL/截图并简单打分。2 周内可用 LLM + 表单 + 本地存储完成。

竞品：Apollo、Clay、LinkedIn Sales Navigator、Hunter.io、Instantly、Lemlist、PhantomBuster

摘要：发帖人做了 lead-scoring SaaS Orty，发现用户和自己一样卡在“去哪里找客户”这一步，于是推出 Orty Scout，根据销售内容与目标客户生成找客户策略。帖子明确面向 freelancers/agencies 招募早期用户，但没有展示付费意愿、收入数据或用户数量。该方向痛点真实且可订阅变现，但竞品密集，差异化需落在“找客户策略”而非爬取数据库。