reddit · SideProject · 11-12 09:50 53 分 ← 返回列表

I built a desktop app that runs Claude Code and Codex as one engineering team (Architect, Developer and QA)

I use Claude Code and Codex every day. Two things kept annoying me: I'd hit my Claude Code limit mid-task and moving the work to Codex meant re-explaining everything. A single agent writes code fast but nobody plans it first or reviews it after. I kept finding edge cases it missed. So I built Conduit. It runs the agents you already have as a small team: - An Architect plans the change, a Developer builds it, QA reviews it before it merges - You can put different agents in di

五维评分

付费意愿

需求真实度

个人可落地

竞争空间

新鲜度

AI 分析

痛点：同时用多个编码 agent 时，限额中断需重述上下文、单一 agent 缺乏规划与审查导致遗漏边界情况

目标用户：已同时使用 Claude Code、Codex 等 AI 编码 agent 的开发者与独立开发者

证据：I'd hit my Claude Code limit mid-task and moving the work to Codex meant re-explaining everything. / A single agent writes code fast but nobody plans it first or reviews it after. I kept finding edge cases it missed.

变现：免费起步转订阅制，按席位或个人/团队版收费，可叠加知识库连接器等高级功能

MVP：做一个轻量 agent 编排 CLI 或菜单栏小工具：一个 agent 负责规划、一个负责实现、一个负责审查，支持上下文在 Claude Code/Codex 间无缝交接，本地运行不上传代码

竞品：Conduit（本贴产品）、Claude Code subagents、Conductor、Crystal、Sculptor

摘要：作者因 Claude Code 频繁触发限额、切到 Codex 要重新解释上下文，且单 agent 写代码快但缺规划与审查，于是做了 Conduit，把 Claude Code 和 Codex 编成架构师/开发/QA 小团队。产品支持限额切换保留上下文、接入 Notion/Confluence 等知识库，本地运行、免费起步。