reddit · SideProject · 09-17 20:50 55 分 ← 返回列表

Built a local-first LaTeX auditor to catch citation drift and unsupported claims before peer review

Hi everyone, I'm an undergrad physics student working in a lab, and I built this out of personal frustration with how much time literature reviews eat up during manuscript preparation. Whenever we write or revise a draft across co-authors, the biggest time sink isn't compiling LaTeX—it's the tedious loop of tracking down references: The literature hunt: You write an assertion (e.g., about a known empirical trend or baseline behavior), you know the prior literature exists, but you hav

五维评分

付费意愿

需求真实度

个人可落地

竞争空间

新鲜度

AI 分析

痛点：学术论文写作中，跨作者反复修改导致引用漂移（citation drift）和缺乏文献支撑的论断，只能在投稿前手动逐条复核，极其耗时。

目标用户：使用LaTeX撰写论文的科研人员、博士生与理工科实验室团队，尤其是对未发表草稿隐私敏感的研究者。

证据：the biggest time sink isn't compiling LaTeX—it's the tedious loop of tracking down references... save hours of manual literature review without uploading unpublished drafts to cloud servers or using generative models that rewrite text and hallucinate fake DOIs.

变现：Freemium 订阅制：个人版按月/年收费，实验室或高校团队授权；也可按投稿前审计次数或参考文献数量计费。

MVP：把已有的浏览器端扫描器打包成 VS Code / Overleaf 插件 + CLI，本地解析 .tex/.bib，输出「引用-论断不匹配」和「无文献支撑论断」清单，支持导出审计报告，2周内可做可用版本。

竞品：Scite.ai、Elicit、Zotero、Paperpile、Mendeley、reciteworks、Inciteful

摘要：一名物理本科生因不满文献综述耗时，发布本地优先的 LaTeX 引用审计工具 Preflight，可在浏览器 Web Worker 内解析草稿与 .bib，自动识别引用漂移和无支撑论断，草稿不上传云端。切入点是隐私敏感的学术写作场景，但帖子未出现任何付费意愿原话或收入数据，且该赛道已有 Scite、Elicit、Zotero 等成熟竞品。